|
|
|
|
|
But there is no sign of any different thinking; the world’s states subsidise raw material prices, and thus the exploitation of resources, to the tune of a billion US dollars per year. At the same time, our lifestyle promotes consumption and the growth of rubbish mountains; we spend money that we do not have to buy things that we do not need.
What?
More efficient and more profitable use of resources can maintain the living standard of the affluent at the same time as enabling economic growth for poorer people. The ultimate aim could be an economic approach working on the ‘cradle to cradle’ principle – a cyclical system in which refuse is food and no resources are lost. But clear preferences have to be established if this aim is to be achieved. Thus avoidance comes before re-use, and recycling is better than incinerating rubbish or disposing of it at landfill sites.
How?
Strategies for reducing the use of resources are already being tried out in parts of the world today. Negotiation is needed in four fields: politics, economics, social fields and new technologies. Subsidies, taxes and charging for rubbish could point things in the right direction. Architects, engineers and designers have specific obligations; they have great influence when products that are more efficient in their use of materials are to be manufactured.
View entire article with photos as PDF
Open new window with PDF or rightclick to download (2,7MB)
|
|
|
|
ACTIVE HOUSE
Active Houses respond to environmental and climatic changes through a holistic approach – and show the way to future standards through experimentation.
Read more
|